Understand the standards and assurance boundaries behind Zoiko iD.

Explore the identity, authentication, delegated authority and evidence standards relevant to Zoiko iD’s architecture. Review implementation scope and published assurance information where verified, and follow authoritative technical or Trust Center sources for details.

Six statuses, each with a precise meaning

A status is always shown as text, with its scope and the date it was last reviewed. A standard name alone never sets a status.

DESIGNED FOR

Intended design

The architecture is built with this standard in
mind. Not a statement of production support.
Confirm scope with engineering
PLANNED

Roadmap intent

Not released. Never described or styled as
available.
No delivery date is stated
IMPLEMENTED

Verified capability

Confirmed by an approved capability record for a stated scope and version.
Scope and version shown
INDEPENDENTLY ASSESSED

Outside review

Reviewed by an independent party. The report,
scope and date are named.
Report access is gated
CERTIFIED

Certification

Issued by a named certifying body, with exact
scope, date and validity.
Shown only with a verified record
NOT PUBLICLY CONFIRMED

Unknown status

No verified public record exists. Absence is never read as non-support.
Ask for details via the expert route

Protocol names are not guarantees. Listing a protocol means it is a subject of the taxonomy. Production support is shown only where an approved capability record exists.

Search and filter the standards registry

Results are read from an approved registry. Each result shows its status, scope, version where confirmed, and the date it was last reviewed.

0 standards match these filters

No standards match these filters

A missing result is not evidence that a standard is unsupported. Clear filters, or ask
an identity expert about a specific standard.

Default sort: curated relevance. Alternatives: alphabetical, last reviewed.

Every entry carries the same fields

Each entry below shows the fields it must display. Until a verified record exists, its status reads as not publicly confirmed.

Protocol engineering visualization

Protocol entry

Scope, component, actor type, edition, limitations and the owning documentation.

NOT PUBLICLY CONFIRMED
Version: not publicly confirmed
Credential verification concept

Credential entry

Issuer, verifier and assurance-level terminology,
with its boundaries.

NOT PUBLICLY CONFIRMED
Boundary: presence is not proof of identity
Agent identity concept

Agent entry

Principal, sponsor, mandate and revocation
concepts for non-human actors.

DESIGNED FOR
Boundary: agent identity is not authority

Protocol subjects, with their status

The protocols below are subjects of the standards taxonomy. None is listed as a confirmed production capability on this page.

ProtocolRole in the
design
Status
OAuth 2.0Delegated token
issuance
NOT PUBLICLY CONFIRMED
OpenID ConnectFederated sign-
in
NOT PUBLICLY CONFIRMED
SAMLEnterprise
federation
NOT PUBLICLY CONFIRMED
SCIMDirectory
provisioning
NOT PUBLICLY CONFIRMED
Security-event frameworksSignals about
trust changes
NOT PUBLICLY CONFIRMED
Server racks in a data center
Abstract data visualization

Authentication & passkeys

WebAuthn and FIDO2 are concepts in the
taxonomy. Their presence in a design does not
confirm a deployed implementation.

Designed for · status to confirm
Documents on a desk

Verifiable credentials

Issuer and verifier roles are distinct. A
credential proves a claim; it does not prove
legal eligibility.

NOT PUBLICLY CONFIRMED
Robotic arm representing machine and AI delegation

Authority is evaluated
separately from identity

A machine or AI agent may be identified without being authorized for anything. Mandate, sponsor, scope, expiry and revocation are the controls that govern its actions.

Principal: the identity that acts.
Sponsor: the accountable party.
Mandate: the bounded grant, with scope and expiry.
Revocation: withdrawal, with timing confirmed per integration.

Applicability is scoped, never assumed

Whether a regulation applies depends on the entity, the activity and the jurisdiction. Product capability does not establish that a regulation is satisfied.

Jurisdiction is named for each applicability statement.
Legal wording is owned by counsel and published in the Privacy
Notice.
No universal regional approval is stated on this page.
Global network of connected nodes representing jurisdictions

Five terms that are often confused

Each term means something different. A design that follows a standard is not the same as a certificate issued for it.

Standard

A published specification or
framework.

Not a claim of compliance

Alignment

Design that follows a
standard, without a formal
result.

Not certification

Certification

Issued by a certifying body,
with validity.

Requires a verified record

Report

The document itself,
released only when
approved.

Access is gated
Team reviewing documents together

From a standards card to a reviewed request

The Trust Center owns authoritative assurance records. This page offers a governed link or a request, never direct access to a restricted file.

Find

Open a standards card
and view evidence.

Scope

Title, edition, date and
visibility.

Sign in

Restricted items use an
authorized flow.

Request

Organization, email,
purpose and asset.

Receipt

Reference shown after
server confirmation.

Decision

Approved, denied, more
information, or revoked.

Access

Time-limited and checked
at access.

A receipt is not an approval. Confidential documents are never placed in URLs, analytics, email, cache or source HTML.

Questions to bring to a scoped review

Team meeting around a table discussing scope

Scope questions

Which actor class and component are in scope?
Which edition and environment apply?
Which jurisdiction is relevant?

Evidence questions

What is the report period and assessor?
Is the evidence current, superseded or withdrawn?
What restrictions apply to sharing it?
Office workspace with evidence documents

Every state is shown in plain language

A missing or unavailable record is never presented as a current, complete picture.

Source unavailable

Standards information is
temporarily unavailable. Public
links remain.

UNAVAILABLE

Withdrawn

The claim is withdrawn. No
download, and no stale status is
shown.

WITHDRAWN

Restricted

Access requires an authorizedrequest. No preview is shown.

RESTRICTED

Under review

The claim is not approved for
publication and is flagged as such.

UNDER REVIEW

Frequently asked questions

Find answers to common questions about Zoiko iD

What standards does Zoiko iD support?+
Zoiko iD supports core identity and federation protocols including OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML 2.0, WebAuthn/FIDO2 and SCIM, alongside delegated authority protocols and continuous security event frameworks. Active capability records confirm specific scope and implementation status for each environment.
How can procurement review evidence?+
Procurement teams can request governed access to assurance evidence through the Trust Center. Requests require organization validation, identity verification, and non-disclosure confirmation before time-limited access to third-party reports is granted.
How do implementation statuses change?+
A status changes only upon formal verification. Status transitions follow engineering sign-off, capability record publication, or completion of independent external assessments. Planned features are never described as available until fully verified.
Does standards alignment mean certification?+
No. Alignment indicates the architecture was designed with a standard in mind. Certification is a distinct, formal designation issued solely by accredited third-party certifying bodies with explicit dates and documented audit scope.
How is delegated authority different from authentication?+
Authentication proves who an actor is (identity verification), while delegated authority establishes what an actor is permitted to do on behalf of another entity, under what scope, for what duration, and subject to what revocation rules.
Does a missing standard mean it is unsupported?+
No. The absence of a standard from the public registry indicates that no formal public capability record has been published yet. Absence should not be interpreted as non-support; organizations can request a scoped review with an identity specialist.

Explore the technical documentation, or talk to an identity expert.

Developers can start with the developer documentation. Enterprise teams can discuss a scoped review with an identity expert.

Developer docs
Trust Center